Abstract
This study aims to explore the relationship between physical fitness levels and cognitive control in Chinese early adolescents, focusing on longitudinal analysis to understand how these variables interact over time. Additionally, the study investigates the moderating effect of gender on this relationship. The study included 160 junior high students (aged 12-14) with gender-balanced participation (64 boys, 79 girls retained after attrition). Utilizing a two-wave longitudinal design, baseline assessments (T1: March-April 2023) evaluated physical fitness through six indicators: body composition (BMI), cardiorespiratory endurance (gender-specific distance runs), vital capacity, speed (50 m sprint), muscular strength (gender-specific tests), and flexibility (sit-and-reach). Cognitive control was measured via: (1) Stroop Color-Word Task (interference inhibition), (2) Go/No-Go Task (impulse control), and (3) Task-Cueing paradigm (cognitive flexibility). Eight-month follow-up (T2: November-December 2023) retained 143 participants (mean age: 12.7 ± 0.52). Cross-lagged path modeling in Mplus 8.0 examined bidirectional causation relationships between fitness domains and cognitive functions, supplemented by SPSS 26.0-based correlational analyses. Descriptive statistics revealed that girls outperformed boys in several physical fitness and cognitive control measures. At T1, girls had significantly higher physical fitness levels (M = 82.51, SD = 8.09) compared to boys (M = 72.19, SD = 10.44, P < 0.001) and performed better in interference inhibition (P < 0.001) and impulse control (P < 0.01). At T2, girls maintained higher physical fitness levels (P < 0.001), but boys demonstrated better cognitive flexibility (M = 802.54, SD = 318.08 vs. M = 983.10, SD = 239.49, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed significant associations between physical fitness and cognitive control, including negative correlations with interference inhibition (r = - 0.582, P < 0.01, indicating that higher fitness levels correspond to lower interference suppression IES scores reflecting better inhibitory control) and cognitive flexibility (r = - 0.548, P < 0.01, indicating that higher fitness levels correspond to lower cognitive flexibility IES scores reflecting better cognitive flexibility), and a positive correlation with impulse control (r = 0.282, P < 0.01). Cross-lagged analysis indicated that physical fitness at T1 significantly predicted interference inhibition (β = - 0.234, P < 0.05), impulse control (β = 0.148, P < 0.05), and cognitive flexibility (β = - 0.499, P < 0.01) at T2. Gender differences analysis revealed that the relationship between physical fitness and cognitive flexibility was significant for boys (P = 0.036, < 0.05) but not for girls. These findings highlight the importance of physical fitness in enhancing cognitive control capabilities during adolescence. The results provide a theoretical foundation for policymakers and educational institutions to prioritize comprehensive physical education programs to foster healthy youth development.