Abstract
In our multidisciplinary memory center at Jena University Hospital, we initiated a regular video consultation for patients at risk of developing dementia or with dementia disease and their relatives at the beginning of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic in spring 2020.Over a 12-month period, we conducted a systematic survey of satisfaction among patients in regular face-to-face contact (F2F) and video consultations (VC).The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential use of telemedicine in older people with incipient cognitive deficits in the context of dementia. In particular, we aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and feasibility.Initial presentations to our memory center for suspected dementia were evaluated in a standardized regular on-site setting (n=50) and in a standardized video consultation (n=40). In both settings, a neuropsychologist's and a physician's consultation were performed consecutively. Both groups were similarly distributed in terms of age and sex (71.4 vs. 72.3 years, 52 vs. 50% female (F2F vs. VC)). Cognitive status was slightly better in the VC group (ACE III significant, MMST not significant).In the survey of the patients using a 12-question inventory (patient satisfaction, rated 1 to 5), there was no significant difference between the two groups overall. However, the F2F tended to be rated slightly better here in terms of advice. More than 80% of the physicians and neuropsychologists rated the technical process of VC as good/very good.A general assessment of the cognitive deficits by physicians and neuropsychologists correlated extremely highly with the results of the subsequent specific testing (MMST and ACE) in F2F and VC. With a tendency to better agreement in VC, the difference between the correlations was not significant.Overall, we could not find any significant differences in patients' satisfaction between VC and classical F2F presentation. Technical aspects in the preparation of a VC and during a VC were less problematic than initially anticipated.