Comparison of percutaneous vs. cutdown access for endovascular aortic repair in the treatment of type B aortic dissection: a meta-analysis

经皮入路与切开入路行血管内主动脉修复术治疗B型主动脉夹层的比较:一项荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) with endovascular aortic repair by cutdown access (CEVAR) in the treatment of TBAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were carefully queried for articles comparing PEVAR and CEVAR in patients with TBAD. The search was performed from the foundation of the databases until March 31, 2025. RESULTS: Totally 24 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included a group of 28,263 patients diagnosed with TBAD, with 14,534 patients undergoing PEVAR and 13,729 patients undergoing CEVAR. In comparison to CEVAR, PEVAR resulted in a reduced hospital length of stay (MD = -2.16 days, 95% CI: -3.05 to -1.27, P < 0.00001), decreased operative time (MD = -40.87 min, 95% CI: -49.72 to -32.02, P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative duration (MD = -1.01 days, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.45, P = 0.0004), diminished incidence of groin infection (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.65, P < 0.0001), lower occurrence of heart-related complications (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.00, P = 0.05), and reduced incidence of lymphocele (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.98, P = 0.04), but a higher incidence of surgical suture failure (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.52 to 4.50, P = 0.0005) and pseudoaneurysm (OR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.09 to 6.41, P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning estimated blood loss, ICU admissions, hematoma, acute kidney injury, lower extremity revascularization, ischemic colitis, and deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to CEVAR, PEVAR was associated with a shorter hospital stay, reduced operative time, quicker postoperative recovery, lower rates of groin infections, fewer cardiac complications, and a diminished occurrence of lymphocele; however, it exhibited a higher incidence of pseudoaneurysm and an increased rate of surgical suture failure. PEVAR was a safe and effective method for the treatment of TBAD. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251110307, PROSPERO CRD420251110307.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。