Abstract
Background: The sphenoid sinus is essential for transsphenoidal surgical accesses to the sellar and parasellar regions because of its anatomic proximity to vital vascular and neurologic structures such as the internal carotid artery, optic nerve, and cavernous sinus. The high degree of morphological variability of the sphenoid sinus has a significant impact on surgical technique and the risk of intraoperative complications. Detailed knowledge of individual anatomy is therefore crucial for the safety and efficacy of transsphenoidal approaches. Objectives: This review aims to conduct a systematic analysis of the current scientific literature on anatomical variations in the sphenoid sinus and their clinical relevance in surgical interventions to the skull base. Special attention is paid to the influence of morphological features on surgical strategies to pathological processes in this area and postoperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched for the period March 2010 to March 2025. Keywords such as "sphenoid sinus", "anatomical variations", "transsphenoidal surgery" and "skull base" were used. Original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses focused on the anatomy, pneumatization, and surgical significance of sphenoid sinus variations are included. Quality and relevance criteria for published material were considered in the selection of articles. Results: The most commonly identified anatomic variations included sellar and lateral pneumaticity, the presence of Onodi cells, multiple and deviated septa, and dehiscence of the posterior wall of the sphenoid sinus and prolapse into its cavity of the internal carotid artery. These variations are associated with an increased risk of intraoperative vascular injury, visual deficit, and postoperative liquorrhea. Accurate preoperative assessment by high-resolution computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as the use of intraoperative neuronavigation, are critical to reduce surgical risk. Conclusions: Anatomic variations in the sphenoid sinus are an essential factor to consider when planning and performing transsphenoidal surgical accesses. An individualized approach based on detailed diagnostic imaging analysis and neuronavigation technologies contributes to a higher safety of the performed surgical interventions, a better radicality of tumor resection and more favorable postoperative outcomes.