Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial intraventricular meningiomas (AIMs) are relatively rare and typically deep-seated tumors that can mandate resection. Compared with transsulcal or transcortical open microscopic approaches, port- or channel-based exoscopic approaches have facilitated a less invasive alternative of tumor access and resection. The authors present a case series of seven patients with AIMs who underwent open microscopic versus channel-based exoscopic resection by a senior neurosurgeon at their institution between 2012 and 2022 to understand patient and tumor features that lent themselves to selection of a particular approach. OBSERVATIONS: In the patients harboring three AIMs selected for channel-based resection, the average AIM diameter (2.9 vs 5.2 cm) was smaller, the AIMs were deeper from the cortical surface (2.5 vs 1.1 cm), and the patients had a shorter average postoperative length of stay (3.3 vs 5.8 days) compared with the four patients who underwent open resection. Gross-total resection was achieved in all cases. Complications for both groups included transient homonymous hemianopsia and aphasia. No recurrences were identified over the follow-up period. LESSONS: The authors demonstrate that channel-based exoscopic resection is safe and effective for AIMs 3 cm in diameter and over 2 cm deep. This may help guide neurosurgeons in future approach selection based on tumor features, including size/volume, location, and depth from cortical surface.