Comparison of the Application of Three Methods for the Determination of Outdoor PM(2.5) Design Concentrations for Fresh Air Filtration Systems in China

中国新风过滤系统室外PM2.5设计浓度测定三种方法的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of fresh-air filtration systems, the methods of determining the outdoor PM(2.5) design concentration have become more important. However, the monitoring of atmospheric fine particles in China started relatively late, and there are relatively few cities with complete data, with obvious regional differences, which led to many problems in the selection of air filters for fresh-air filtration systems. In this paper, three methods of determining outdoor PM(2.5) design concentration were analyzed using the daily average concentration of PM(2.5) in 31 provincial capital cities from 2016 to 2020. Six typical cities in different regions were also taken as examples. The advantages and disadvantages of the three existing statistical methods were compared and analyzed, as well as the corresponding differences in the selection of outdoor PM(2.5) concentration value on the filter systems. The results showed that the method of mathematical induction was more accurate and reasonable for the calculation of outdoor PM(2.5) design concentrations. The local outdoor PM(2.5) design concentration could be quickly calculated using the recommended coefficient K and annual average PM(2.5) concentration of the region, especially for small and medium-sized cities without monitoring data. However, the recommended coefficient K should be provided based on the specific region, and should be divided into values for strict conditions and normal conditions during use. This would provide a simple and effective way to select the correct air filters for practical engineering.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。