Abstract
PURPOSE: The concept of non-mass abnormalities of the breast has been employed in Japan for approximately 20 years. Although B-mode findings are classified as non-mass abnormalities, the usefulness of adding color Doppler ultrasonography (US) and strain elastography to B-mode US is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study (JABTS BC-07) to establish the diagnostic criteria for breast US, including color Doppler and elastography, for non-mass abnormalities of the breast and verify their diagnostic usefulness. METHODS: We registered US images of non-mass abnormalities of the breast and their clinical and histopathological data from 13 institutions (202 malignant and 183 benign non-mass lesions). Furthermore, we evaluated the centralized image interpretation usefulness of the diagnostic criteria for B-mode and color Doppler US, as well as the sensitivity and specificity when color Doppler US and elastography were added to B-mode US. RESULTS: Echogenic foci in the mammary gland (odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92-6.19, p < 0.0001) and the configuration of internal solid components of the ducts (odds ratio 0.056, 95% CI 0.005-0.591, p < 0.0165) significantly differentiated benign and malignant non-mass abnormalities. The sensitivity of B-mode alone (83.7%) was significantly improved by adding color Doppler US (93.1%) (p = 0.0004); however, adding color Doppler US and elastography to B-mode US made no significant difference in either sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSION: Although adding color Doppler US and elastography to B-mode US improved sensitivity, the diagnostic significance was limited. Therefore, a comprehensive diagnostic method comprising mammography and magnetic resonance imaging is warranted.