Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the FilmArray GI Panel multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) compared to conventional stool culture (CSC) and microscopic stool analysis in children with bacterial acute infectious gastroenteritis (AIG) in the emergency department (ED). It also assessed the impact of PCR use on clinical decision-making, antibiotic stewardship, and ED workflow. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a tertiary pediatric ED. Children diagnosed with AIG who underwent CSC, microscopy, and multiplex PCR were included. Data on demographics, clinical findings, diagnostic results, antibiotic prescriptions, and patient outcomes were collected. Diagnostic performance metrics-sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)-were compared. RESULTS: Among 257 pediatric patients, enteropathogens were detected in 31.9% via CSC and 39.3% via multiplex PCR. PCR showed superior sensitivity (96.2%) and NPV (97.4%) compared to CSC. The median turnaround time for PCR (7.9 h) was significantly shorter than for CSC (47.5 h, p < 0.001). Antibiotic use was significantly lower in PCR-negative cases (p < 0.001), and ED length of stay was also reduced. CONCLUSION: The FilmArray GI Panel offers improved sensitivity and faster results than conventional methods, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. Its integration in ED protocols can support antimicrobial stewardship and streamline care.