[Comparison of functional outcomes between tenecteplase and alteplase as bridging thrombolysis prior to mechanical throm-bectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion]

[对急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞患者,在机械取栓术前使用替奈普酶和阿替普酶作为桥接溶栓治疗的功能性结果进行比较]

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase as bridging intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the Acute Stroke Patients for Stroke Management Quality Evaluation online database (CASE-Ⅱ, NCT04487340). Patients with AIS and large vessel occlusion who received tenecteplase or alteplase followed by mechanical thrombectomy within 24 hours of symptom onset from December 2022 to March 2025 were included. The patients were divided into the tenecteplase group and the alteplase group. Propensity score matching (1∶4) was performed based on age, sex, door-to-needle time (DNT), door-to-puncture time (DPT), and onset-to-door time. Binary logistic regression and general linear models were used to compare 3-month functional and safety outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for patients with onset-to-needle time (ONT)≤4.5 h, and subgroup analyses were performed based on age, sex, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, occlusion site, DNT and DPT. RESULTS: Among 1505 enrolled patients, 250 received tenecteplase and 1255 received alteplase. No significant differences were observed in 3-month functional outcomes between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, the tenecteplase group had lower 3-month all-cause mortality (OR=0.676, 95%CI: 0.470-0.972, P=0.032). After matching, 224 tenecteplase-treated and 767 alteplase-treated patients were included. There were no significant differences in functional or safety outcomes between the two groups (all P>0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that among patients with an onset-to-needle time (ONT) ≤4.5 hours, there were no statistically significant differences in 3-month functional or safety outcomes between the tenecteplase group and the alteplase group (all P>0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that no statistically significant differences in 3-month functional independence were observed across all subgroups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In AIS patients with large vessel occlusion undergoing bridging thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy, tenecteplase and alteplase showed comparable 3-month functional and safety outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。