Percutaneous renal biopsy adverse event rates: Coaxial or non-coaxial technique

经皮肾活检不良事件发生率:同轴或非同轴技术

阅读:2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the coaxial and non-coaxial techniques in terms of adverse events (AEs) resulting from the percutaneous renal biopsy. A secondary aim was to determine the potential effect of the sclerosed glomeruli on AEs. Patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous renal biopsy in our interventional radiology clinic between January 2013 and December 2021 were scanned retrospectively. Demographic data, laboratory findings, ultrasonography findings, numbers of glomeruli and sclerotic glomeruli in the material, and post-biopsy AEs were retrieved. Data from procedures performed using coaxial and non-coaxial techniques were compared in terms of AEs. After applying exclusion criteria, 239 patients were included in the study (non-coaxial technique: 94 [60.7%] vs coaxial technique: 94 [39.3%]). The number of samples taken did not differ significantly between groups (2.60 ± 0.74 vs 2.55 ± 0.66, P = .835). However, the number of capsule passes was considerably lower in the coaxial group (2.60 ± 0.74 vs 1.08 ± 0.28, P < .001). The overall AE rate was 12.1% (n = 29). Mild-moderate AEs were significantly more common in the non-coaxial group compared to the coaxial group (n = 21 [14.5%] vs 1 [1.1%]; P < .001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in severe AE rates between the 2 groups (n = 4 [2.8%] vs n = 3 [3.2%]; P = .567). No significant correlation was found between number or proportion of sclerosed glomeruli and AEs. There was no significant difference in severe AEs between the 2 techniques. However, the coaxial technique was associated with a lower rate of mild-moderate AEs and fewer capsule passes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。