Elective single blastocyst transfer can achieve acceptable clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared with elective double cleavage-stage embryo transfer in fresh cycles

与新鲜周期中选择性双卵裂期胚胎移植相比,选择性单囊胚移植可以达到可接受的临床妊娠率和活产率。

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) and elective double cleavage-stage embryo transfer (eDET) on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed a total of 2941 fresh transfer cycles, including 1548 eSBT cycles and 1393 eDET cycles. Clinical pregnancy, twin pregnancy and live birth rates of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Overall, the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth in the eDET group were significantly higher than those in the eSBT group (75.1% vs. 71.3%, P = 0.019; 66.6% vs. 63.0%, P = 0.039). It was shown that eDET lifted the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth for patients aged less than 35 years (aOR 1.783, 95% CI 1.451-2.191; aOR 1.508, 95% CI 1.262-1.803) but not for patients age 35 years and over (aOR 0.874, 95% CI 0.538-1.421; aOR 1.036, 95% CI 0.638-1.682). The twin pregnancy rate in the eSBT group was significantly lower than that in the eDET group at all ages (aOR 32.116, 95% CI 21.758-47.404; aOR 14.325, 95% CI 5.449-37.657). CONCLUSION: Compared with eDET, eSBT achieves clinically acceptable pregnancy and live birth rates while drastically reducing the risk of twin pregnancy in fresh cycles. It is generally recommended that infertile couples undergo eSBT during fresh cycles when possible, especially for females aged 35 years and over.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。