Maternal oxygen exposure may not change umbilical cord venous partial pressure of oxygen: non-random, paired venous and arterial samples from a randomised controlled trial

母体氧气暴露可能不会改变脐静脉氧分压:来自一项随机对照试验的非随机配对静脉和动脉样本

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of oxygen (O(2)) in intrauterine resuscitation, the obstetric scientists' understanding of O(2) therapy is full of contradictions. We tested the hypothesis that higher maternal arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PO(2)) is associated with higher umbilical cord venous PO(2) (UvPO(2)). METHODS: This is a planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), 443 normal women were 1:1 randomly allocated to receive 2 L/min O(2) or room air from the onset of second stage to delivery. We reported that maternal 2 L/min O(2) exposure cannot affect the umbilical cord arterial pH or the fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern. In 217 non-random samples, we found 2 L/min O(2) exposure increased the maternal arterial PO(2) to the median 150 mmHg (hemoglobin would be saturated). The primary outcome for this analysis was UvPO(2) in these non-random samples. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the O(2) group (N = 107) and the control group (N = 110) in the UvPO(2) (median 30.2, interquartile 25.4-35.2 versus median 28.3, interquartile 23.4-35.3, mmHg, P = 0.379). There were also no significant differences between room air and different percentiles of O(2) exposure duration (< 25th, ≧ 25th < 50th, ≧ 50th < 75th, ≧ 75th percentile) in the UvPO(2). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal O(2) exposure at super-physiological levels (median arterial blood PO(2) 150 mmHg) in normal labor may not change the UvPO(2). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221440 , first posted in 20 August 2014.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。