Performance evaluation of immunoassay for infectious diseases on the Alinity i system

在 Alinity i 系统上对传染病免疫测定进行性能评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although a diagnosis of infectious diseases is essential for timely treatment, the performance of diagnostic tests has been hardly evaluated due to variable results that are influenced by multiple factors in different conditions. In the present study, the performance of the Alinity i system, which is a newly developed immunoassay to diagnose infectious diseases, was evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, linearity, correlation, and carryover of 16 analytes (HAV Ab IgG, HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBe, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab, EBV VCA IgM, EBV VCA IgG, EBV EBNA IgG, CMV IgM, CMV IgG, Toxoplasma IgG, Rubella IgG, and Syphilis TP) of Alinity i by comparison with ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system following the rationale of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RESULTS: For quantitative tests, the coefficients of variation (CV) % of repeatability and intermediate precision were between 0% and 4.18%. The coefficients of the linearity (r(2) ) over a widely tested analytical range were ≥ 0.990 and the correlation between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was strong (r ≥ 0.994). For qualitative tests, the agreement between Alinity i and the ARCHITECT i2000(SR) system was excellent (kappa coefficient 1) with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Carryover rates for all analytes were less than 1.0% (-0.11% ~ 0.21%). CONCLUSION: The Alinity i system showed good analytical performance and favorable comparability with the ARCHITECT i2000(SR.) It could be suitable as a routine immunoassay analyzer for screening and diagnosis of infectious disease.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。