The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia in great saphenous varicose vein surgery, based on hemodynamics and anesthesia efficacy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial

基于血流动力学和麻醉疗效,确定右美托咪定作为0.59%罗哌卡因辅助药物用于大隐静脉曲张手术硬膜外麻醉的最佳剂量:一项随机、对照、双盲临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia on perioperative hemodynamics and anesthesia efficacy in patients undergoing great saphenous varicose vein surgery. METHODS: A total of 90 patients were randomly divided into three groups: 0.25 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED(1) group), 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED(2) group), and 0.75 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with 0.59% ropivacaine epidural infusion group (ED(3) group). Hemodynamics, anesthesia efficiency, and adverse reactions were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with the ED(1) group, the ED(2) group had lower systolic blood pressure at T(1-3) (T(1), 95%CIs, 6.52-21.93, p < 0.001; T(2), 95%CIs, 2.88-18.21, p = 0.004; T(3), 95%CIs, 0.49-18.17, p = 0.035), and the diastolic blood pressure at T(1-2) was decreased (T(1), 95%CIs, 4.55-14.36, p < 0.001; T(2), 95%CIs, 0.37-12.17, p = 0.033). Compared with the ED(2) group, the ED(3) group had higher systolic blood pressure at T(1-2) (T(1), 95%CIs, 5.90-21.46, p < 0.001; T(2), 95%CIs, 2.07-17.55, p = 0.008) and higher diastolic blood pressure at T(1-3) (T(1), 95%CIs, 2.91-12.81, p = 0.001; T(2), 95%CIs, 1.32-13.23, p = 0.011; T(3), 95%CIs, 0.14-11.52, p = 0.043). Compared with the ED(2) group, the heart rate was significantly decreased at T(1-4) in the ED(3) group (T(1), 95%CIs, 2.25-15.72, p = 0.005; T(2), 95%CIs, 2.35-13.82, p = 0.003; T(3), 95%CIs, 0.50-9.79, p = 0.025; T(4), 95%CIs, 1.46-10.36, p = 0.005). The myocardial oxygen consumption in all three groups was significantly decreased at each time point compared to T(0) (p < 0.05 or < 0.001), and no significant between-group differences were detected (P>0.05). Compared with the ED(1) group, the anesthesia efficiency of ED(2) and ED(3) groups was markedly enhanced, but the risk of bradycardia in ED(2) and ED(3) groups was dramatically increased (6 of 28 [21.4%] vs. 14 of 30 [46.7%] and 14 of 27 [51.9%], p = 0.023), one patient in the ED(3) group experienced difficulty urinating, and remaining adverse reactions were mild in all three groups. CONCLUSION: A measure of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine is the optimal dose as a 0.59% ropivacaine adjuvant for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing great saphenous varicose vein surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, registration number: ChiCTR2200060619.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。