Abstract
Since the 1990s, Vietnam has begun prioritising preventing and combating drug-related crimes (supply reduction) and rehabilitating drug users (demand reduction). In the 2000s, harm reduction approaches in relation to drug control began to be recognised as one of Vietnam's opiate substitution therapy methods before embarking on greater drug policy reform in the early 2010s. In implementing the ideology of the Communist Party of Vietnam, the anti-narcotic police forces often apply a zero-tolerance approach to drug traffickers and identify drug users as a priority applies a zero-tolerance approach to drug traffickers and identifies drug users as a priority to send them to prison or compulsory detention centres rather than apply harm reduction as the international standard model to promote health conditions for them without detention. This study conducted a qualitative content analysis of documents by collecting and analysing grey literature on drug policy resources, combined with qualitative interviews with experts and drug policy professionals. Although Vietnam (re)states its commitment to balance the three pillars of harm minimisation in its drug policy reform, my research demonstrates that unclear provisions and blurred policies remain, and the challenges associated with scaling these approaches equally may not be feasible in reality. To do this, this study briefly explains (1) why Vietnam dominates the use of supply reduction-driven measures with 'hard strikes' for drug-related crimes, including the death penalty; (2) why Vietnam continues to use compulsory detention facilities for drug users as the main component of its demand reduction policy; and (3) why Vietnam still struggles to apply harm reduction, including in relation to policing practices. Some specific recommendations are called for further consideration to support harm reduction in policing.