Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our anecdotal experience from foetal neuroimaging studies suggests that there are often significant disagreements between the findings of ultrasonography (USS) and in utero MR (iuMR) imaging in cases of antenatally detected supratentorial extra-axial cysts. Although this is a relatively rare clinical situation, it warrants further investigation because of the high risk of other intracranial abnormalities that are likely to cause long-term neurodevelopmental problems. METHODS: We reviewed 957 consecutive referrals for iuMR of the foetal brain over a 3.5-year period and studied all cases where the referral from USS described supratentorial extra-axial cysts in the foetus. The iuMR imaging was reviewed, and a comparison between the results of the two examinations was made. RESULTS: Supratentorial extra-axial cysts were an unusual referral for iuMR occurring in only 13/957 (1.4%) of cases. The findings on USS and iuMR imaging were conflicting in all 13 cases with intracranial pathology being excluded on iuMR imaging in 4 cases and more significant pathology being shown in 9 cases. Abnormalities of the corpus callosum were recognized in association with a cyst in eight cases, and this was recognized in only two cases on USS. Six of those cases also had abnormalities of cortical formation. CONCLUSION: iuMR imaging should be used in the assessment of pregnancies in which a supratentorial extra-axial cyst has been detected on USS. This is based on the improved primary diagnosis and a high rate of associated brain abnormalities not detected on USS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our retrospective observational study examines a range of foetal intracranial abnormalities which are better defined using iuMRI. This is a previously described spectrum of neurodevelopmental anomalies which we suggest would benefit from MRI.