Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies

皮质类固醇治疗慢性鼻窦炎的疗效和安全性:随机和非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS), focusing on health-related quality of life, disease severity, systemic steroid-sparing effects, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized and non-randomized studies in adults with CRS. Outcomes included SNOT-22 scores, endoscopic findings, systemic corticosteroid use, and SAEs. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses employed random-effects models, with pooled estimates reported as Mean Differences (MD) or Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Eleven studies (3,542 patients) were included. Corticosteroid therapy significantly improved SNOT-22 scores (MD = -16.00, 95% CI: -18.91 to -13.09, p < 0.0001; I² = 90.3%) and endoscopic outcomes (MD = -2.32, 95% CI: -2.71 to -1.94, p < 0.001; I² = 61.2%). Local corticosteroids reduced systemic steroid dependence (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.27-0.34, p < 0.0001; I² = 0%). No statistically significant increase in SAEs was observed (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.44-4.93, p = 0.9848; I² = 0%). Heterogeneity was high for SNOT-22 and endoscopic outcomes, but funnel plots showed no major publication bias. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroids improve quality of life and objective disease measures in CRS while reducing reliance on systemic steroids, with no significant increase in SAEs. Future studies should compare delivery modalities, assess long-term safety, and explore biomarker-guided strategies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。