Ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block for perioperative analgesia: A comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

超声引导下骶骨多裂肌平面阻滞用于围手术期镇痛:一项全面的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sacral multifidus plane block (SMPB) is an emerging regional anaesthesia technique targeting the dorsal rami of sacral spinal nerves, with potential applications in lower limb, pelvic, and perineal surgeries. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has not been systematically synthesised. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the study was registered prospectively in PROSPERO. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (January 2019-May 2025) for RCTs comparing SMPB with other regional techniques or no block. The primary outcome was time to rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included 24-h opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model; trial sequential analysis (TSA) and GRADE assessment were performed. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs (n = 768; 348 received SMPB) were included. SMPB significantly prolonged time to first rescue analgesia, reduced 24-h opioid consumption, and lowered pain scores at rest and movement during the first postoperative day, particularly during the intermediate (6-12 h) and late (24 h) postoperative periods. Patient satisfaction was generally higher with SMPB, correlating with improved analgesia and reduced opioid use. TSA confirmed the robustness of findings for time to rescue analgesia and opioid consumption, although the required sample size was not reached. No serious block-related complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: SMPB appears to be a safe, effective regional anaesthesia technique, offering opioid-sparing benefits, prolonged analgesia, and high patient satisfaction. However, current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and potential publication bias.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。