Abstract
This letter provides a critical appraisal of the comprehensive meta-analysis by Hou et al, which synthesizes the incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) in organ transplant recipients. Their work establishes a pooled POD incidence of 20%, with significant variability across organ types (lung 34%, liver 22%, kidney 6%), and identifies key risk factors including primary graft dysfunction, hepatic encephalopathy, and high model for end-stage liver disease/acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores. This commentary acknowledges the study's strength in providing a robust, trans-organ synthesis of current evidence. However, it critically discusses the substantial heterogeneity, the counterintuitive non-significance of age as a risk factor, and the unavoidable limitation of unmeasured confounders inherent in meta-analyses, such as preoperative cognitive/psychiatric status and anesthetic protocols. While the findings provide an essential evidence base for risk stratification and prevention, this letter argues that the high heterogeneity underscores the need for organ-specific analysis and calls for large-scale, prospective studies with standardized protocols to translate these findings into reliable clinical prediction tools and targeted interventions.