Abstract
It is crucial to identify Enterobacterales that produce carbapenemase to treat and manage hospital infections. The suggested techniques for their identification need a lengthy wait, technical knowledge, and training. Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) provide a solution to these requirements. Thus, this study compared LFIA with phenotypic and genotypic tests for carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Fifty clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant superbugs were examined. KPC, VIM, NDM, IMP, and OXA-48-like enzymes were evaluated and compared with phenotypic tests and LFIA. Regarding the phenotypic characteristics, the mCIM was positive in 37/50 (74%), and the eCIM was positive in 21/50 (42%). Regarding using LFIA, 41 out of the total isolates (82%) gave a positive red line with one or more of the tested genes. The most frequently detected gene was bla(NDM) (27/50 (54%)), and the least detected one was bla(IMP) (14/50 (28%)), which was in accordance with the PCR results. While investigating the accuracy of LFIA vs. PCR, it was found that LFIA had 100% sensitivity in the detection of the bla(NDM) and bla(OXA) genes, with 85.2% and 91.4% specificity, respectively, while for the bla(IMP), bla(KPC), and bla(VIM) genes, the values were 91.7% and 92.1%, 94.1% and 90.9%, and 95.5% and 89.3%, respectively. The overall accuracy of LFIA ranged from 92 to 94%. Our comparison with molecular assays revealed remarkable agreement, so we propose that this test might be utilized as a supplementary tool.