Voice Outcomes in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

喉咽反流患者语音结局:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) commonly causes voice disturbances, yet treatment efficacy remains debated. This review synthesizes evidence on voice outcomes in patients with LPR. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review (2000-2024) identified eight studies evaluating pharmacological, behavioral, and diagnostic approaches. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess effect sizes (ES), heterogeneity (I²), and subgroup differences. Behavioral interventions (e.g., Lee Silverman Voice Treatment {LSVT}, voice therapy) demonstrated robust efficacy (ES=0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, I²=0%), whereas proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) showed negligible effects (ES = -0.15). Adjunctive rikkunshito significantly improved outcomes in refractory LPR cases (ES=0.82). Diagnostic methods based on acoustic analysis or the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) yielded more reliable outcomes (ES=0.56) than those based on clinical symptoms or the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) (ES=0.32, I²=94.45%). Long-term benefits beyond six months were inconsistent (ES=0.25, I²=97.47%). Behavioral therapies outperform pharmacological treatments in managing LPR-related voice dysfunction, though diagnostic precision and long-term adherence remain critical. Future studies should prioritize standardized diagnostic protocols and investigate multimodal therapeutic strategies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。