Abstract
Background: The genetic quality of laboratory mice may have a direct impact on the results of research. Therefore, it is essential to improve genetic monitoring methods to guarantee research quality. However, few current methods boast high efficiency, high throughput, low cost, and general applicability at the same time. Methods: First, we got 34 SNP loci from previous studies for inbred strains and screened out 15 loci with good polymorphism for outbred groups from these 34 loci. Then, by using the Luminex xTAG assay, we tested inbred strains and outbred groups. Results: We tested commonly used inbred strains and five DNA samples from the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science, obtaining correct genotyping results. Additionally, some loci were potentially confirmed to be useful for distinguishing C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse substrains. Furthermore, we tested three outbred groups and analyzed the genetic structure, and we compared the results of the SNP markers by xTAG assay to the STR markers by PCR, the trends of the three groups are the same. Conclusions: In our studies, the panels could meet the requirements for method promotion and provide a good choice for the genetic monitoring of inbred and outbred mice.