Abstract
After 32 generations of a divergent selection experiment for residual variance of birth weight in mice, two divergent lines were thus obtained: the heterogeneous line (H-line) and the homogeneous line (L-line). Throughout the generations, differences were observed between the two lines in traits such as litter size, survival at weaning, and birth weight variability caused by unidentified environmental conditions. The L-line exhibited advantages in terms of higher survival rates, larger litter sizes, and less sensitivity to changes in food intake. The study is an examination of the effects of climate as an environmental factor on the performance of these animals. Climate factors including maximum, minimum, and mean temperature (T), humidity (H), and TH index; at three stages (the fecundation, a week before the parturition and the parturition), were linked to a birth weight dataset consisting of 22,614 records distributed as follows: 8,853 corresponding to the H-line, 12,649 to the L-line, and 1,112 to the initial population. Out of the 27 analyzed climatic variables, the maximum temperature 1 wk before parturition (MXTW) was identified as the most influential when comparing heteroscedastic models with the deviance information criterion. The order of Legendre polynomial to apply in the following random regression model was tested by a cross-validation using homoscedastic models. Finally, MXTW was compared on how it affected the two divergent lines by analyzing predicted breeding values (PBV) obtained from a random regression heteroscedastic model. The mean PBV of the H-line in the first generation showed a range of 0.070 g with a negative slope, which was 35 times higher than the range obtained for the L-line, which varied within 0.002 g. In the last generation of selection, the H-line exhibited greater instability of PBV across temperatures, with a difference of 0.101 g between the maximum and minimum mean PBV, compared to 0.017 g for the L-line. The standard deviations of the slopes in the H-line were more dispersed than in the L-line. Unlike the H-line, the L-line had slopes that were not significantly different from 0 throughout the generations of selection, indicating greater stability in response to MXTW variations. The H-line exhibited a higher sensitivity to changes in MXTW, particularly in birth weight, with the L-line being more stable. The selection for uniformity of birth weight could lead to less sensitive animals under environmental changes.