Outcomes of Intravenous Normal Saline Infusion Pre-Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Versus No Infusion in Fasting

空腹状态下,心脏植入式电子设备术前静脉输注生理盐水与不输注生理盐水的疗效比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous puncture failure during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation is a significant procedural challenge, particularly in fasting patients. Pre-procedural intravenous normal saline (NS) infusion may enhance venous filling and improve procedural outcomes, but evidence in this setting is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, including 2852 patients undergoing CIED implantation. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received intravenous NS infusion prior to the procedure (n = 1130) and those who did not (n = 1722). Baseline demographics, procedural details, and outcomes-including venous puncture failure, arterial puncture, site change, and acute kidney injury (AKI)-were compared. RESULTS: The NS group demonstrated a significantly lower rate of venous puncture failure (4.6% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.001) and arterial puncture failure (1.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03). AKI occurred less frequently in the NS group, although this difference was not statistically significant (1.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.09). Predictors of venous puncture failure included absence of NS infusion (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-3.0), BMI ≥ 30, and CKD. ROC analysis demonstrated good model discrimination (AUC = 0.81). CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural NS infusion significantly improves venous puncture success in fasting patients undergoing CIED implantation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。