Abstract
PURPOSE: Intravenous contrast poses challenges to computed tomography (CT) muscle density analysis. We developed and tested corrections for contrast-enhanced CT muscle density to improve muscle analysis and the utility of CT scans for the assessment of myosteatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using retrospective images from 240 adults who received routine abdominal CT imaging from March to November 2020 with weight-based iodine contrast, we obtained paraspinal muscle density measurements from noncontrast (NC), arterial, and venous-phase images. We used a calibration sample to develop 9 different mean and regression-based corrections for the effect of contrast. We applied the corrections in a validation sample and conducted equivalence testing. RESULTS: We evaluated 140 patients (mean age 52.0 y [SD: 18.3]; 60% female) in the calibration sample and 100 patients (mean age 54.8 y [SD: 18.9]; 60% female) in the validation sample. Contrast-enhanced muscle density was higher than NC by 8.6 HU (SD: 6.2) for the arterial phase (female, 10.4 HU [SD: 5.7]; male, 6.0 HU [SD:6.0]) and by 6.4 HU [SD:8.1] for the venous phase (female, 8.0 HU [SD: 8.6]; male, 4.0 HU [SD: 6.6]). Corrected contrast-enhanced and NC muscle density was equivalent within 3 HU for all correctionns. The -7.5 HU correction, independent of sex and phase, performed well for arterial (95% CI: -0.18, 1.80 HU) and venous-phase data (95% CI: -0.88, 1.41 HU). CONCLUSIONS: Our validated correction factor of -7.5 HU renders contrast-enhanced muscle density statistically similar to NC density and is a feasible rule-of-thumb for clinicians to implement.