Femoral head diameter varies widely in hips with developmental dysplasia and predicts acetabular component size in total hip arthroplasty

股骨头直径在发育性髋关节发育不良患者中差异很大,并且可以预测全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体的尺寸。

阅读:1

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the femoral head diameter (FHD) and the degree of subluxation in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients, and develop a machine-learning model for predicting acetabular component size in total hip arthroplasty (THA) according to demographic data and FHD. METHODS: The FHD of 469 DDH patients from Longwood Valley medical database was measured, after excluding those with severe femoral head destruction, bone grafting, or augments. Its distribution and difference across Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications were also assessed. Five machine-learning algorithms were developed to predict the size of the acetabular component, and the best model was determined according to the mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and R-squared values. The accuracy of the best model's cup size prediction was validated by comparing it with acetate templating and CT-based planning in a consecutive cohort from an independent institution. RESULTS: The FHD gradually decreased with increasing Crowe and Hartofilakidis classifications. The Pearson correlation coefficient between FHD and the size of the acetabular component was 0.60, indicating a moderate correlation. In the test set, the random forest model outperformed the other four models in terms of MSE (0.904), RMSE (0.951), and R-squared (0.919). In the external validation, the accuracy of this model was not significantly different from CT-based planning (80.0% vs 87.5%, p > 0.05), but outperformed acetate templating (80.0% vs 52.5%, p < 0.05), particularly for Crowe Type IV (81.8% vs 27.3%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The FHD decreases with increasing degree of subluxation in DDH patients. The machine-learning model constructed by combining demographic parameters and FHD demonstrates significantly higher accuracy in acetabular component size planning compared to templating methods. This approach serving as an effective auxiliary tool or alternative when CT is unavailable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。