Abstract
Evolutionary models of quantitative traits often assume trade-offs between beneficial and detrimental traits, requiring modellers to specify a function linking trait values. The choice of trade-off function can be consequential; functions that assume diminishing returns (accelerating costs) typically lead to single equilibrium genotypes, while decelerating costs often lead to genetic polymorphisms. Despite their importance, our current theory has little to say on which trade-off functions are the most biologically plausible. To address this gap, we explored how the genetic determination of quantitative traits can lead to different trade-off functions, using resistance to infectious diseases as an example trait. We developed a model where alleles at separate loci pleiotropically increase resistance while decreasing fecundity. We then used this model to generate genotype landscapes and investigate how epistasis effects the trade-off function. Regardless of the strength of epistasis, our model consistently led to accelerating costs. We then incorporated our genotype model into an eco-evolutionary model of disease resistance. Unlike other models with accelerating costs, our approach often led to genetic polymorphisms. Our results suggest that accelerating costs are a strong null model for evolutionary trade-offs and that the eco-evolutionary conditions required for polymorphism may be more nuanced than previously thought.