Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia

一组血浆生物标志物对不同类型痴呆症的鉴别诊断性能

阅读:5
作者:Elisabeth H Thijssen, Inge M W Verberk, Jana Kindermans, Adlin Abramian, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Andrew J Ball, Yolande Pijnenburg, Afina W Lemstra, Wiesje M van der Flier, Erik Stoops, Christophe Hirtz, Charlotte E Teunissen

Discussion

A combination of plasma p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ1-42/1-40, might be useful to discriminate AD, FTD, and DLB.

Methods

We measured the biomarkers with Simoa in two separate cohorts (n = 160 and n = 152). In one cohort, Aβ1-42/1-40 was also measured with mass spectrometry (MS). We assessed the differential diagnostic value of the markers, by logistic regression with Wald's backward selection.

Results

MS and Simoa Aβ1-42/1-40 similarly differentiated AD from controls. The Simoa panel that optimally differentiated AD from FTD consisted of NfL and p-tau181 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94; cohort 1) or NfL, GFAP, and p-tau181 (AUC = 0.90; cohort 2). For AD from DLB, the panel consisted of NfL, p-tau181, and GFAP (AUC = 0.88; cohort 1), and only p-tau181 (AUC = 0.81; cohort 2).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。