Strategies for Teaching Uncertainty Tolerance in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study

医学教育中教授不确定性容忍度的策略:一项定性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine how experienced healthcare educators conceptualize and teach uncertainty tolerance and identify strategies to inform medical education curricula for complex, unpredictable clinical environments. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study with 15 healthcare educators during a multiday, high-fidelity prehospital simulation at a United States military-affiliated medical training facility. Participants completed semistructured interviews, a demographic questionnaire, and the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Short Form. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using iterative coding and constant comparison to identify themes grounded in participants' lived experiences. This study was reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) confidence through exposure-early, repeated, realistic practice fosters automatic responses under pressure; (2) safety fosters engagement-psychological safety, supportive leadership, and diversity of thought encourage active engagement with uncertainty; (3) growth through insight-structured reflection, constructive feedback, and learning from mistakes promote development; and (4) navigating ambiguity with flexible thinking-cognitive flexibility, probabilistic reasoning, and philosophical reframing support decision-making without paralysis. CONCLUSION: Uncertainty tolerance is a teachable, multifaceted competency. Curricular strategies should include early and repeated exposure, psychologically safe learning environments, structured reflection, and training in flexible thinking. Integrating these elements, particularly in high-stakes specialties like emergency medicine, may improve clinical reasoning, patient care, and clinician resilience. These findings serve as a foundation for further research to empirically examine how such approaches influence clinical reasoning, patient care, and clinician well-being.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。