Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the deception rate or concordance between the interview on smoking and cooximetry in COPD patients from a monographic consultation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study to evaluate the concordance between the values of cooximetry and the response to a clinical interview on smoking. SETTING: COPD monographic consultation, Pneumology, Seville. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD in any degree. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical interview and measurement of carbon monoxide by cooximetry. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Cooximetry values, responses on smoking, sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: n: 169. 107 patients presented values less than or equal to 6 ppm compared to 62 with values greater than 6 ppm, determining a prevalence of active smoking of 36.7%. The deception rate was 19.5% of the total sample (24.3% of all those who claimed not to smoke), with a Cohen kappa of 0.48 and p < 0.000. 40% of patients confessed not having told the truth. No relationship of this data was found with age, accumulated tobacco consumption or FEV1. A significant relationship with sex was found (deception rate: 31.8% in women vs. 15.2% in men, p 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of our attempts to make patients stop smoking, a considerable deception rate was found in our consultation; higher among women, recent ex-smokers or in the process of abandonment, so it would be essential to incorporate objective measures such as the cooximeter in the approach of this type of patient.