Abstract
AIM: There is limited evidence highlighting the implications of adjunctive topical application of wound healing agents on clinical and patient-related outcomes in surgical procedures. The aim of the retrospective analysis was to evaluate the effects of 0.8% hyaluronic acid (HA) gel on wound healing following tooth extraction and crown lengthening procedures using the Inflammatory Proliferative and Remodeling (IPR) scale in a postgraduate clinical setting. METHODS: A retrospective assessment of medical record database related to clinical and patient-related outcomes of patients who received tooth extraction or crown lengthening procedures was conducted. Wound healing was assessed using the IPR scale providing scores for patient-reported postoperative pain, bleeding, granulation tissue, hematoma, tissue color compared to unaffected site, complete/incomplete flap closure, suppuration, and edema. The test group included participants who received an adjuvant application of 1mL of 0.8% HA gel versus control group participants receiving the same procedures without HA gel application. RESULTS: Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between the total IPR wound healing scores for test (5.54 ±1.02) versus control (5.19 ±1.21, P=0.30) groups. Bleeding and hematoma were less frequent in participants receiving 0.8% HA gel, though the differences were not statistically significant (bleeding: P=0.09, hematoma: P=0.12). Of the 45 participants analysed, 79.2% in the test group achieved successful inflammatory phase scores (5-8), compared to 76.2% in the control group (P = 0.81). More sites with a successful inflammatory phase (score 5-8) were observed in systemically healthy, male, non-smokers, and those with posterior mandibular surgeries, though without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although 0.8% HA gel did not significantly improve early wound healing, well-designed clinical trials are necessary to evaluate its safety and potential benefits in routine periodontal surgeries. The IPR wound healing index demonstrated high reliability with excellent inter- and intra-examiner agreement in assessing the initial healing process after periodontal surgery.