Abstract
Cells contain numerous membraneless organelles that assemble by intracellular liquid-liquid phase separation. The viscous properties and associated biomolecular mobility within these condensed phase droplets, or condensates, are increasingly recognized as important for cellular function and also dysfunction, for example, in protein aggregation pathologies. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is widely used to assess condensate fluidity and to estimate protein diffusion coefficients. However, the models and assumptions utilized in FRAP analysis of protein condensates are often not carefully considered. Here, we combine FRAP experiments on both in vitro reconstituted droplets and intracellular condensates with systematic examination of different models that can be used to fit the data and evaluate the impact of model choice on measured values. A key finding is that model boundary conditions can give rise to widely divergent measured values. This has important implications, for example, in experiments that bleach subregions versus the entire condensate, two commonly employed experimental approaches. We suggest guidelines for determining the appropriate modeling framework and highlight emerging questions about the molecular dynamics at the droplet interface. The ability to accurately determine biomolecular mobility both in the condensate interior and at the interface is important for obtaining quantitative insights into condensate function, a key area for future research.