Abstract
This study investigated the cooling effects of landscape interventions and their relative magnitude under hybrid urban context including time-varying building shadow cast. The study focused on the practical design alternatives, rather than experimental scenarios. We conducted outdoor thermal comfort (OTC) simulation using ENVI-met, and spatial-temporal comparison analysis for three green space expansion interventions for new Gwanghwamun square, Seoul, South Korea. In addition, we statistically analyzed the relationship between TCR (tree coverage ratio), GCR (green coverage ratio), WCR (water coverage ratio) and PET (Physiological Equivalent Temperature). The correlation and regression coefficients of the relationships under different building density, building locations and shadow cast conditions were compared. As a result of three interventions comparison, the comfort zone increased almost two times, while the discomfort zone decreased to ≈70% of the current condition in the long-term alternative. As TCR increases 22%, PET decreases up to 2.6 °C in average. Tree coverage ratio showed significant importance among the landscape elements. The influence of trees was slightly different for different contexts; larger cooling effect was found in no building shadow cast and low-density buildings. However, the difference was not noticeable; the influence of trees is still effective under building shadow cast and high-density buildings. Moreover, for high tree density area (TCR>50%), temporal gap of thermal comfort between measured time that mainly caused by building shadow change was greatly reduced compared to low tree density area (TCR<5%), which suggest the important role of tree in providing consistent thermal comfort. This study provides scientific evidence for trees' cooling effect and its relative magnitude under diverse built contexts of N-S oriented urban canyon. This study also contributes to developing an inclusive thermal comfort evaluation method based on both temporal and spatial scales for the effective comparison of real-world design alternatives.