Abstract
Part I of this series showed that the five-element circuit model accurately mimics impedances measured using multi-frequency electrical impedance myography (MFEIM), focusing on changes brought on by disease. This paper addresses two requirements which must be met if the method is to qualify for clinical use. First, the extracted parameters must be reproducible over long time periods such as those involved in the treatment of muscular disease, and second, differences amongst normal subjects should be attributable to known differences in the properties of healthy muscle. It applies the method to five muscle groups in 62 healthy subjects, closely following the procedure used earlier for the diseased subjects. Test-retest comparisons show that parameters are reproducible at levels from 6 to 16% (depending on the parameter) over time spans of up to 267 days, levels far below the changes occurring in serious disease. Also, variations with age, gender and muscle location are found to be consistent with established expectations for healthy muscle tissue. We conclude that the combination of MFEIM measurements and five-element circuit analysis genuinely reflects properties of muscle and is reliable enough to recommend its use in following neuromuscular disease.