Evaluating the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Versus Volume-Controlled Ventilation Modes on Intraoperative Bleeding in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

评估压力控制通气模式与容量控制通气模式对鼻整形术中出血的影响:一项随机临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative bleeding is one of the major challenges in rhinoplasty. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) versus volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) modes on intraoperative bleeding during rhinoplasty. METHODS: In a double-blinded randomized clinical trial, 58 candidates for rhinoplasty were randomly assigned to the PCV or VCV groups. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using the same total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) method in both groups. The amount of bleeding was assessed by counting blood-soaked gauze and measuring the content of the suctioned fluid. Additionally, bleeding in the surgical field was assessed by the surgeon using the Boezaart criterion. RESULTS: The mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 30 ± 45 mL in the PCV group and 100 ± 120 mL in the VCV group (P < 0.001). According to logistic regression analysis, the odds of experiencing moderately severe or severe bleeding in the VCV group were 5.4 times higher than in the PCV group. After adjusting for confounding variables, the odds ratio increased to 26.8 (95% CI = 1.2, 59.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that the pressure-controlled mode may lead to lower intraoperative bleeding compared to the volume-controlled mode. The decrease in peak airway pressure is likely a contributing factor to this observation.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。