Abstract
In the companion paper to this, we examined the consequences for patterns of linkage disequilibrium of the "gene" model of fitness, which postulates that the effects of recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations located at different sites within a gene fail to complement each other. Here, we examine the consequences of the gene model for the genetic and inbreeding loads, using both analytical and simulation methods, and contrast it with the frequently used "sites" model that allows allelic complementation. We show that the gene model results in a slightly lower genetic load, but a much smaller inbreeding load, than the sites model, implying that standard predictions of mutational contributions to inbreeding depression may be overestimates. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled, and shown to considerably reduce the inbreeding load for both the gene and sites models. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to data on inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster. The widespread assumption that inbreeding depression is largely due to deleterious mutations should be re-examined in the light of our findings.