Abstract
This study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound, a noninvasive treatment, for managing urinary incontinence (UI) in women. This is a single-center, retrospective study involving 28 women. Patients, aged between 32 and 65, were included. Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes, neurological disease, active urinary tract infection, undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, who had incontinence surgery, and receiving estrogen therapy were excluded from the study. Incontinence severity was evaluated with the International Incontinence Consultation Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Patients were evaluated before treatment and 6 months after treatment using the ICIQ-SF and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Assessment short form. In the analysis of numerical variables independent or paired t test or linear mixed effects models were used. Least square means were used in post hoc comparisons. Mean age of the patients was 45.50 ± 7.59 years. There were 18 (64%) stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 10 (36%) mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Six months after treatment, mean ICIQ-SF and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Short Form Questionnaire scores showed a significant positive change. After the procedure, UI completely disappeared in 43% of the patients. The rate of severe UI decreased from 39% to 8%, and very severe UI decreased from 8% to 0%. Incontinence severity was significantly different in the MUI and SUI groups before and after the procedure. After the procedure, UI completely disappeared in 67% of the patients in the SUI group, while it remained at a mild level in 33%. The decrease in ICIQ-SF score in the SUI group was significantly higher than that in the MUI group. There were no severe adverse events, in 4 patients there was mild vaginal discharge which resolved in 1 week. This study showed that high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment, can be effective and safe even in a single session. Selection and recall biases are potential biases in retrospective studies. Lacking a control group is another limitation. Although advances in technology are very important for medical treatments, their effectiveness and safety need to be proven. Future research in this area with a larger sample size and a prospective design will offer further evidence supporting effectiveness of this treatment model.