Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of virtual video-assisted visits, added to the tight-control strategy for inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs), in identifying patients who need treatment adjustment. METHODS: Tightly followed-up adult patients with RA, PsA, AS or SLE took part in a video consultation during COVID19 lockdown and repeated the same rheumatology evaluations through a face-to-face visit within 2 weeks. The sensitivity and specificity of the virtual visits for treatment decisions (categorized as: unchanged, adjusted/escalated, tapered/discontinued, need for further examinations), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for virtually measured disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were calculated with 95% CIs using face-to-face visits as the reference method. RESULTS: In 89 out of 106 patients (84.0%), face-to-face visits confirmed the remotely delivered treatment decision. Video-visiting showed excellent sensitivity (94.1% with 95% CI: 71.3%, 99.9%) and specificity (96.7%; 95% CI: 90.8%, 99.3%) in identifying the need for treatment adjustment due to inadequate disease control. The major driver for the low sensitivity of virtual video consultation (55.6%; 95% CI: 21.2%, 86.3%) in identifying the need for treatment tapering was SLE diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 10.0; 95% CI: 3.1, 32.3; P <0.001], mostly because of discordance with face-to-face consultation in glucocorticoid tapering. Remotely evaluated PROs showed high reliability (ICC range 0.80-0.95), while disease activity measures had less consistent data (ICC range 0.50-0.95), especially for those diseases requiring more extensive physical examination, such as in SLE and PsA. CONCLUSION: Video-visiting proved to have high reliability in identifying the need for treatment adjustment and might support the IRDs standard tight-control strategy.