Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare maternal complications, perinatal outcomes, and neurodevelopment 1 year after the birth between concordant and discordant twins in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included twin pregnancies delivered between 24 + 1 and 38 + 2 weeks of gestation between January 2011 and September 2019. Chorionicity was confirmed by ultrasonography and was categorized into monochorionic and dichorionic. Each was then divided into two groups (concordant and discordant) according to birth weight discordancy. Maternal complications and neonatal outcomes, including neurodevelopmental delays, were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 298 pairs of twin pregnancies were enrolled, of which 58 (19.26%) women were pregnant with monochorionic diamniotic twins and 240 (80.54%) with dichorionic diamniotic twins. In both monochorionic and dichorionic twins, the discordant twins had a greater incidence of emergency deliveries because of iatrogenic causes than the concordant twins. Among dichorionic twins, discordant twins had lower birth weight rates and higher hospitalization rates and morbidities than concordant twins. Among monochorionic twins, discordant twins had a lower birth weight and higher neonatal mortality than concordant twins. The neonatal size was not a predictor of neurodevelopment in this group. Based on the logistic regression analysis, male sex, respiratory distress syndrome, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were risk factors for the neurodevelopmental delay; birth weight discordancy was significant only in dichorionic twins. Conclusions: Perinatal outcomes in discordant twins may be poor, and neurodevelopment 1 year after birth was worse in discordant twins than in concordant twins. Discordancy in twins can be a risk factor for neurodevelopmental delay.