Abstract
Based on personal experience over several years, we carried out a comparative analysis of two different European health systems, in Portugal and France, from a perspective comparing occupational medicine and use of telemedicine in a postpandemic context. This analysis addressed four aspects: Health System; Occupational Medicine; Telemedicine/Telework; and Future and Suggestions. The study employed searches and review of recent articles, guidelines, and recommendations from the authorities responsible for regulation (Medical Doctors Order, Labor Legislation, and Medical Collegiate Recommendations) and analysis of some statistical indicators from recent studies. Three tables on Occupational Health and Medicine present some relevant data and facilitate comparisons. Despite the difficulties of comparison, given the basic differences between these two systems (Beveridge vs. Bismark), it can be concluded that there is a greater acceptance of judicious use of teleconsultation in France (from 15 to 35%). This includes its use by occupational nurses, in the context of the "Visite de Information et Prevention", with good acceptance among employers and employees. There are still some difficulties to be resolved concerning security, conducting biometrics, and objective examinations. We expect that these issues will be overcome with improved biosensing, adequate training, and proper regulation. Given the shortage of occupational physicians and the customary overrunning of legal deadlines, we believe that these possibilities and suggestions should be explored and adopted by the specialty's Collegiates. Certain recommendations to this effect are made.