Abstract
A promising therapeutic approach to diminish pathological inflammation is to inhibit the synthesis and/or biological activity of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). Prior studies have shown that intraperitoneal administration of small-molecule inhibitors targeting the catalytic pocket of MIF (e.g., ISO-1) elicits a therapeutic effect in mouse inflammation models. However, it remains to be elucidated whether these tautomerase activity inhibitors block the synthesis and/or biological activity of MIF. In this study, we investigated and compared the activity of representative MIF inhibitors from isoxazole series (fluorinated analog of ISO-1; ISO-F) and substituted quinoline series (compound 7E; 7E). Our results demonstrate that ISO-F is a more potent MIF inhibitor than 7E. Both ISO-F and 7E do not inhibit MIF synthesis but "bind-onto" MIF thereby blocking its recognition. However, in contrast to 7E, ISO-F docks well in the active site of MIF and also has a stronger binding affinity towards MIF. In line with these observations, ISO-F, but not 7E, robustly inhibits the biological function of MIF. Most importantly, ISO-F, when administered orally in a therapeutic regimen, significantly suppresses dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced murine colitis. This study, which provides mechanistic insights into the anti-inflammatory efficacy of ISO-F, is the first documented report of in vivo anti-inflammatory efficacy of a MIF inhibitor upon oral administration. Moreover, the findings from this study reinforce the potential of catalytic site of MIF as a target for eliciting therapeutic effect in inflammatory disorders. Compounds (e.g., ISO-F) that block not only the recognition but also the biological function of MIF are potentially attractive for reducing pathological inflammation.