Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) being a primary treatment for intermediate-stage disease. However, post-procedural pain remains a significant challenge due to inconsistent management practices and a lack of standardised protocols. This scoping review synthesises current evidence on pain management strategies in HCC patients undergoing TACE, evaluates their effectiveness, identifies practice gaps, and proposes optimisation strategies. Methods: A comprehensive database search according to the methodological approach given by Arksey and O'Malley with the aid of the PRISMA-ScR guidelines across Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus was performed. The terms associated with pain, TACE, and liver cancer were included in the search strategy. Two independent researchers systematically screened study titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted key study characteristics and approaches to pain management. Results: Of 1515 identified studies, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Most (72.7%) focused on pharmacological interventions, with dexamethasone and lidocaine being the most frequently investigated agents. Non-pharmacological approaches, including psychological interventions, physical therapies, music therapy, health education, and comprehensive nursing, were also reported. Pain was primarily assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS). Conclusions: Pharmacological interventions, particularly dexamethasone and lidocaine, remain the cornerstone of pain management in TACE, yet consensus on their optimal use is lacking. Non-pharmacological strategies provide complementary benefits. standardised, evidence-based pain management protocols integrating both approaches are needed. Future large-scale, multicentre trials are essential to establish the most effective strategies for optimising patient outcomes.