Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several nitric oxide (NO) generating devices have been developed to deliver NO between 1 part per million (ppm) and 80 ppm. Although inhalation of high-dose NO may exert antimicrobial effects, the feasibility and safety of producing high-dose (more than 100 ppm) NO remains to be established. In the current study, we designed, developed, and tested three high-dose NO generating devices. METHODS: We constructed three NO generating devices: a double spark plug NO generator, a high-pressure single spark plug NO generator, and a gliding arc NO generator. The NO and NO(2) concentrations were measured at different gas flows and under various atmospheric pressures. The double spark plug NO generator was designed to deliver gas through an oxygenator and mixing with pure oxygen. The high-pressure and gliding arc NO generators were used to deliver gas through a ventilator into artificial lungs to mimic delivering high-dose NO in the clinical settings. The energy consumption was measured and compared among the three NO generators. RESULTS: The double spark plug NO generator produced 200 ± 2 ppm (mean ± SD) of NO at gas flow of 8 L/min (or 320 ± 3 ppm at gas flow of 5 L/min) with electrode gap of 3 mm. The nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)) levels were below 3.0 ± 0.1 ppm when mixing with various volumes of pure oxygen. The addition of a second generator increased the delivered NO from 80 (with one spark plug) to 200 ppm. With the high-pressure chamber, the NO concentration reached 407 ± 3 ppm with continuous air flow at 5 L/min when employing the 3 mm electrode gap under 2.0 atmospheric pressure (ATA). When compared to 1 ATA, NO production was increased 22% at 1.5 ATA and 34% at 2 ATA. The NO level was 180 ± 1 ppm when connecting the device to a ventilator with a constant inspiratory airflow of 15 L/min, and NO(2) levels were below 1 (0.93 ± 0.02) ppm. The gliding arc NO generator produced up to 180 ± 4 ppm of NO when connecting the device to a ventilator, and the NO(2) level was below 1 (0.91 ± 0.02) ppm in all testing conditions. The gliding arc device required more power (in watts) to generate the same concentrations of NO when compared to double spark plug or high-pressure NO generators. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that it is feasible to enhance NO production (more than 100 ppm) while maintaining NO(2) level relatively low (less than 3 ppm) with the three recently developed NO generating devices. Future studies might include these novel designs to deliver high doses of inhaled NO as an antimicrobial used to treat upper and lower respiratory tract infections.