Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting persists on RBD but not NTD after sequential Omicron infections

祖先SARS-CoV-2免疫印记在连续Omicron感染后仍保留在RBD上,但在NTD上则不存在。

阅读:1
作者:Zuowei Wang ,Ling Li ,Ruiping Du ,Xixian Chen ,Yi Sun ,Rongrong Qin ,Yunjian Li ,Hualong Feng ,Lin Hu ,Xuanyi Chen ,Maosheng Lu ,Liwei Jiang ,Teng Zuo

Abstract

Whether Omicron exposures could overcome ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting remains controversial. Here we analyzed B cell responses evoked by sequential Omicron infections in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Plasma neutralizing antibody titers against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and variants indicate that immune imprinting is not consistently induced by inactivated or recombinant protein vaccines. However, once robustly induced, immune imprinting is not countered by successive Omicron challenges. We compared binding specificities, neutralizing capacities, developing origins and targeting epitopes of monoclonal antibodies from those individuals. Although receptor-binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain (NTD) of spike are both primary targets for neutralizing antibodies, immune imprinting only shapes antibody responses to RBD by impeding the production of Omicron-specific neutralizing antibodies while facilitating the development of broadly neutralizing antibodies. We propose that immune imprinting can be either neglected by NTD-based vaccines to induce variant-specific antibodies or leveraged by RBD-containing vaccines to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。