Comparison of hourly walking and alternating walking-resistance breaks versus prolonged sitting on 26-h glucose responses in sedentary adults: a randomized crossover trial

比较每小时步行和交替进行步行-阻力休息与长时间坐姿对久坐成年人26小时血糖反应的影响:一项随机交叉试验

阅读:3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare 26-h glycemic responses to uninterrupted sitting versus hourly brisk walking breaks and an alternating walking-resistance break strategy in sedentary young adults, with exploratory sensitivity analyses adjusting for energy expenditure (EE). METHODS: Eighteen sedentary, healthy young adults (11 female; age, mean (SD) = 23.7 (2.5) years; BMI, 21.2 (2.0) kg/m(2)) completed three 26-h laboratory protocols in a randomized crossover design. Each protocol included a 22-h stay in a metabolic chamber and one 9-h intervention: uninterrupted sitting (SIT), 8-min bouts of brisk walking at 60% VO(2)max every 60 min (WALK), or alternating 8-min bouts of simple resistance activities and brisk walking every 60 min (RESWALK). Interstitial glucose was recorded every 5 min by continuous glucose monitoring across the all three 26-h trials; the primary outcome was 26-h glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC). RESULTS: The primary outcome, 26-h glucose iAUC, showed a significant condition effect (overall p = 0.039). Compared with SIT, RESWALK reduced 26-h iAUC by 17.3% (Cohen's d = -0.61, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.12; p = 0.043), while the reduction in WALK was not significant; these effects were attenuated after adjusting for EE (p = 0.085). For secondary outcomes, both WALK and RESWALK reduced glucose iAUC during the 9-h intervention window (p ≤ 0.027), with RESWALK being more effective than WALK (p = 0.021). However, during the 5-h evening period, iAUC was higher in WALK compared with SIT (p = 0.011), while no differences were observed during the 8-h sleep period. Regarding glucose variability, only CONGA_1 was significantly lower in RESWALK versus SIT (p ≤ 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with prolonged sitting, interrupting sedentary behavior with hourly breaks of combined walking and resistance exercises improves 26-h glycemic control in healthy young adults, EE-adjusted sensitivity analyses attenuated the 26-h effect. Walking-only breaks provided daytime benefits but did not significantly improve 26-h glucose exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1800019120.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。