Evaluating the outcomes of patient safety education programs in nursing education: a scoping review

评估护理教育中患者安全教育项目的成效:一项范围界定综述

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the trends in scholarly research related to patient safety education programs and outcome evaluations in the field of nursing education, focusing on providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of patient safety education and suggesting directions for future program development and evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's 5-step framework and searched five databases; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), PubMed, Science Direct, and Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) for Korean literature. RESULTS: Of the 1626 articles retrieved, we identified 27 articles published between 2006 and 2023. The articles' educational content focused on comprehensive patient safety education using instructional methods such as lectures, discussions, simulations, and online education. The effectiveness of the programs was evaluated primarily via knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward patient safety, and behavioral and results-related outcomes were rarely evaluated at Kirkpatrick's evaluation., The most commonly used tools were the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey and the questionnaire developed by the World Health Organization Patient Safety Program. The evaluation was conducted using quantitative and qualitative methods, but follow-up tests were rarely conducted. CONCLUSION: Our review findings suggest that patient safety education programs for nursing students and clinical nurses should apply diverse teaching methods and comprehensive evaluation strategies to enhance their overall effectiveness and ensure the practical application of safety practices. It is essential to diversify program evaluation metrics, such as experiential learning and interprofessional education, by expanding performance indicators at both learner and institutional levels for long-term repeated assessments.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。