Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current recommendations from regulatory authorities suggest quantitative surface sampling for detection of hazardous drugs at least once every 6 months. A more frequent and efficient process for hazardous drug testing might reduce the safety risks associated with exposure to these agents. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to assess the findings of surface testing based on traditional quantitative sampling methods relative to the findings of qualitative surface sample testing with the BD HD Check system. The secondary objectives included assessment of the ease of integrating qualitative sampling into pharmacy protocols and identification of opportunities to enhance patient and staff education and safety. METHODS: Samples from 23 unique surfaces were tested concurrently once a month for 5 months using a quantitative surface sampling method and the qualitative BD HD Check system on adjacent 12 inch × 12 inch (30.5 cm × 30.5 cm) surface areas. The presence or absence of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and/or doxorubicin contamination was assessed by each of the 2 testing methods. The BD HD Check system was also assessed for ease of use and efficiency. RESULTS: Ten areas of contamination were identified over the 5-month period. Nine were detected by the BD HD Check system and one by the quantitative system. The BD HD Check system was easy to use, with results available in less than 10 minutes per area tested. CONCLUSIONS: The BD HD Check system allows for more timely identification of surface contamination with hazardous drugs than the standard sampling protocol. The discrepancy in results between the 2 methods of hazardous drug surface sampling requires further investigation.