Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the intricate landscape of healthcare amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of mucormycosis as a severe complication posed a significant challenge to primary healthcare. This study delved into the complexities of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in COVID-19 patients with mucormycosis undergoing treatment with conventional amphotericin B. METHODS: Ethically approved and meticulously conducted, the study scrutinized 154 ADRs in depth, shedding light on their classification, outcomes, and interventions in COVID patients with mucormycosis. A descriptive analysis was carried out to report the findings of this study. RESULTS: The findings revealed that a substantial proportion (85.6%) of these ADRs were manageable, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring and timely interventions. Notably, gender disparities surfaced, indicating potential gender-specific responses to amphotericin B. Causality assessments based on the WHO-UMC scale classified the majority of ADRs as certain, providing a robust foundation for understanding the intricate relationships between amphotericin B and the observed adverse events. CONCLUSION: This research not only categorizes ADRs as preventable and manageable but also offers practical insights into their nature and the diverse strategies employed for their management. The study's outcomes underline the importance of personalized healthcare approaches that can be adopted by primary care physicians for effective patient care.