Abstract
Three-dimensional printing technology is a rapid prototyping technology that has been widely used in manufacturing. However, the printing parameters in the 3D printing process have an important impact on the printing effect, so these parameters need to be optimized to obtain the best printing effect. In order to further understand the impact of 3D printing parameters on the printing effect, make theoretical explanations from the dimensions of mathematical models, and clarify the rationality of certain important parameters in previous experience, the purpose of this study is to predict the impact of 3D printing parameters on the printing effect by using machine learning methods. Specifically, we used four machine learning algorithms: SVR (support vector regression): A regression method that uses the principle of structural risk minimization to find a hyperplane in a high-dimensional space that best fits the data, with the goal of minimizing the generalization error bound. Random forest: An ensemble learning method that constructs a multitude of decision trees and outputs the class that is the mode of the classes (classification) or mean prediction (regression) of the individual trees. GBDT (gradient boosting decision tree): An iterative ensemble technique that combines multiple weak prediction models (decision trees) into a strong one by sequentially minimizing the loss function. Each subsequent tree is built to correct the errors of the previous tree. XGB (extreme gradient boosting): An optimized and efficient implementation of gradient boosting that incorporates various techniques to improve the performance of gradient boosting frameworks, such as regularization and sparsity-aware splitting algorithms. The influence of the print parameters on the results under the feature importance and SHAP (Shapley additive explanation) values is compared to determine which parameters have the greatest impact on the print effect. We also used feature importance and SHAP values to compare the importance impact of print parameters on results. In the experiment, we used a dataset with multiple parameters and divided it into a training set and a test set. Through Bayesian optimization and grid search, we determined the best hyperparameters for each algorithm and used the best model to make predictions for the test set. We compare the predictive performance of each model and confirm that the extrusion expansion ratio, elastic modulus, and elongation at break have the greatest influence on the printing effect, which is consistent with the experience. In future, we will continue to delve into methods for optimizing 3D printing parameters and explore how interpretive machine learning can be applied to the 3D printing process to achieve more efficient and reliable printing results.