Abstract
Cerebral protein profiling in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is needed to better comprehend secondary injury pathways. Cerebral microdialysis (CMD), in combination with the proximity extension assay (PEA) technique, has great potential in this field. By using PEA, we have previously screened >500 proteins from CMD samples collected from TBI patients. In this study, we customized a PEA panel prototype of 21 selected candidate protein biomarkers, involved in inflammation (13), neuroplasticity/-repair (six), and axonal injury (two). The aim was to study their temporal dynamics and relation to age, structural injury, and clinical outcome. Ten patients with severe TBI and CMD monitoring, who were treated in the Neurointensive Care Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were included. Hourly CMD samples were collected for up to 7 days after trauma and analyzed with the 21-plex PEA panel. Seventeen of the 21 proteins from the CMD sample analyses showed significantly different mean levels between days. Early peaks (within 48 h) were noted with interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, transforming growth factor alpha, brevican, junctional adhesion molecule B, and neurocan. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 peaked after 3 days. Late peaks (>5 days) were noted with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-2, MCP-3, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, Dickkopf-related protein 1, and DRAXIN. IL-8, neurofilament heavy chain, and TAU were biphasic. Age (above/below 22 years) interacted with the temporal dynamics of IL-6, IL-1ra, vascular endothelial growth factor, MCP-3, and TAU. There was no association between radiological injury (Marshall grade) or clinical outcome (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) with the protein expression pattern. The PEA method is a highly sensitive molecular tool for protein profiling from cerebral tissue in TBI. The novel TBI dedicated 21-plex panel showed marked regulation of proteins belonging to the inflammation, plasticity/repair, and axonal injury families. The method may enable important insights into complex injury processes on a molecular level that may be of value in future efforts to tailor pharmacological TBI trials to better address specific disease processes and optimize timing of treatments.